Creatine evidence guide
Creatine Monohydrate: Benefits, Dosage, Safety and Evidence
Creatine monohydrate can modestly improve strength and measured lean mass when paired with progressive resistance training, and it improves some repeated high-intensity exercise measures.
The familiar 3–5 g/day regimen is well studied in healthy adults; broader brain, mood, glucose, bone and longevity claims are not established.1,2,3,4,5,8,13,18

At a glance
Creatine
Study findings describe groups, not a guaranteed result for one person.
Research and writing
LongevityMate Editorial Team
Editorial oversight
Lukas Dvorsky, FounderClinical review
Not yet assigned or claimed
Popular claims, checked
What supplement influencers are saying
These claims are included because people encounter them. Follower count, a podcast opinion and a personal routine are not scientific proof.
What is claimed
Evidence check
Exaggerated. The brain-energy mechanism is plausible, but EFSA found no established cause-and-effect for general cognition. The strongest new signal is limited to selected tasks during severe sleep loss after unusually high one-off doses.
What is claimed
Evidence check
Partly supported for a small muscle or strength addition with resistance training, but not as a universal need. Bone-density benefit is not supported, and broad cognition or longevity effects are unproven.
What is claimed
Evidence check
Unsupported as a group. Micronizing may improve mixing, and HCl is more soluble, but neither proves better outcomes. Buffered creatine failed to outperform monohydrate. Gummies must prove identity, dose and stability.
What is claimed
Evidence check
The first half is fair: research includes older adults and clinical questions. The universal longevity conclusion is not. No trial shows that creatine extends human life or prevents major age-related disease.
What is claimed
Evidence check
Mostly unsupported or overstated. Kidney reviews show a small creatinine rise without demonstrated filtration harm in studied healthy adults; controlled hydration data are reassuring; 1 small 12-week hair trial found no DHT or hair change. Rare and high-risk harms remain uncertain, and no cycling requirement is established.
What is claimed
Evidence check
Contradicted. Loading only accelerates saturation; consistent maintenance works. Timing evidence does not establish a meaningful pre- or post-workout advantage, and routine cycling is unnecessary.
Anecdote can start a question—not answer it
A personal experience cannot show whether the supplement caused the change, how often it works or whether it is safe for someone else.